WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. military has put countering China and Russia at the center of a new national defense strategy unveiled on Friday, the latest sign of shifting priorities after more than a decade and a half of focusing on the fight against Islamist militants.<\/p>\n
In presenting the new strategy, which will set priorities for the Pentagon for years to come, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis called China and Russia \u201crevisionist powers\u201d that \u201cseek to create a world consistent with their authoritarian models.\u201d<\/p>\n
The \u201cNational Defense Strategy\u201d represents the latest sign of hardening resolve by President Donald Trump\u2019s administration to address challenges from Russia and China, at the same time he is pushing for improved ties with Moscow and Beijing to rein in a nuclear North Korea.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe will continue to prosecute the campaign against terrorists that we are engaged in today, but great power competition, not terrorism, is now the primary focus of U.S. national security,\u201d Mattis said in a speech presenting the strategy document, the first of its kind since at least 2014.<\/p>\n
It sets priorities for the U.S. Defense Department that are expected to be reflected in future defense spending requests. The Pentagon on Friday released an unclassified, 11-page version of the document, which did not provide details on how the shift towards countering China and Russia would be carried out.<\/p>\n
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking through an interpreter at a news conference at the United Nations, said the United States was using a confrontational approach.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is regrettable that instead of having a normal dialogue, instead of using the basis of international law, the U.S. is striving to prove their leadership through such confrontational strategies and concepts,\u201d Lavrov said.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re open for dialogue, we\u2019re prepared to discuss military doctrines,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n
China\u2019s U.S. embassy criticized the strategy, saying Beijing sought \u201cglobal partnership, not global dominance.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf some people look at the world through a cold war, zero-sum game mindset, then they are destined to see only conflict and confrontation,\u201d an embassy spokesman said in a statement.<\/p>\n
Elbridge Colby, deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, said at a briefing with reporters that Russia was far more brazen than China in its use of military power.<\/p>\n
Russia annexed Ukraine\u2019s Crimean peninsula in 2014 and intervened militarily in Syria to support its ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Still, Moscow was limited by its economic resources, Colby said.<\/p>\n
China, on the other hand, was described as economically and militarily ascendant. China has embarked on a far-reaching military modernization that Colby said was in \u201cdeep contravention to our interests.\u201d<\/p>\n
Experts praised the document\u2019s targeting of the largest national security threats rather than the longer lists of risks in some previous strategies. But without knowing the budget commitments, it was difficult to assess if it was a sound strategy.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf we don\u2019t actually see where the money is, you know, there is the danger that it could become all words,\u201d said Mara Karlin, a fellow at the Brookings Institution think tank and a senior defense official in the Obama administration.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The document also listed North Korea among the Pentagon\u2019s priorities, citing the need to focus U.S. missile defenses against the threat from Pyongyang, which beyond its nuclear weapons has also amassed an arsenal of biological, chemical, and conventional arms.<\/p>\n
The document said that international alliances would be critical for the U.S. military, by far the world\u2019s best-resourced. But it also stressed a need for burden-sharing, an apparent nod to Trump\u2019s public criticism of allies who he says unfairly take advantage of U.S. security guarantees.<\/p>\n
Trump has called the NATO alliance \u201cobsolete\u201d, but Mattis said the United States would strengthen its traditional alliances while building new partnerships and listening more to other nations\u2019 ideas.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe will be willing to be persuaded by them, recognizing that not all good ideas come from the country with the most aircraft carriers,\u201d Mattis said.<\/p>\n
The Pentagon is also working on a policy document on the country\u2019s nuclear arsenal. While Mattis did not specifically address that review, he said the priority is deterrence.<\/p>\n
\u201cHow do we maintain a safe and effective nuclear deterrence so those weapons are never used? It is a nuclear deterrent, it is not a war fighting capability unless it is the worst day in our nation or the world\u2019s history,\u201d Mattis said.<\/p>\n
Mattis had harsh words for the U.S. Congress and its inability to reach agreement on budgets.<\/p>\n
The U.S. military\u2019s competitive edge has eroded \u201cin every domain of warfare\u201d he said, partly because of inconsistent funding. A bill to fund the government only through Feb. 16, approved on Thursday night by the House of Representatives, appeared on the verge of collapse in the Senate.<\/p>\n
\u201cAs hard as the last 16 years of war have been, no enemy in the field has done more to harm the readiness of the U.S. military than the combined impact\u201d of spending caps and short-term funding.<\/p>\n
In sheer spending terms, the United States\u2019 military outlay per year is still far more than China and Russia. The United States is spending $587.8 billion per year on its military, China $161.7 billion and Russia $44.6 billion.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n